USA – TEXAS Trends and Developments Contributed by: John Flaim and Dyan House, Baker McKenzie
intended to create a product that parodied the Jack Daniel’s products and successfully did so, the Court considered the Sleekcraft factors after noting that a successful parody is not often likely to create confusion. While neither party prevailed with respect to the Sleekcraft factors, the Court was not able to conclude that confusion is likely. Conclusion The cases discussed above both have nar - row holdings and, as is typical with trade mark cases, fact-specific analyses. Because of that, the authors expect to see more challenges with regard to applications of the First Amendment in the trade mark context in the coming years.
767 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook