SOUTH AFRICA Trends and Developments Contributed by: Julia Stephens and Roberto Barreiro, KISCH IP
nature thereof; rather, only once it has been inte - grated into the legal system by statute. • Institutional readiness – considering the strict timelines for international applications, particularly when the Trade Marks Office of a designated state refuses an application or any such application faces third-party opposition, it is clear that the companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) will need to establish the necessary systems and infrastructure to process and manage inter - national applications effectively and time - ously. This will require significant investment in the training of personnel and developing adequate systems to be able to handle a sub - stantial increase in trade mark applications while still complying with the provisions of the Madrid Protocol. Advantages and challenges of implementing the Madrid Protocol in South Africa The most pertinent advantages regarding the implementation of the Madrid Protocol are that: • it provides a trade mark owner with a cost- effective manner of securing protection across a number of jurisdictions; and • it ought to bring about a degree of admin - istrative efficiency at the CIPC as they will need to develop their systems to ensure that they are compliant with the provisions of the Madrid Protocol. On the face of it, the advantages offered as a result of implementing the Madrid Protocol are promising. However, it would be naïve to view the above-mentioned advantages without due consideration of the challenges currently experi - enced by the Trade Marks Office in South Africa. Historically, and still today, the South African Trade Marks Office has experienced substantial
backlogs – resulting in significant delays in see - ing a trade mark through to final registration. The implementation of the Madrid Protocol will only result in further delays due to higher volumes of applications being received. On this basis, it would seem that the South Afri - can Trade Marks Office will be hard-pressed to meet the 18-month examination period required by the Madrid Protocol. This in itself may result in a mismatch with the World International Prop - erty Organization (WIPO)’s database, which will automatically record the designation as regis - tered (if the WIPO are not informed of the objec - tion timeously), whereas the South African Trade Marks Register may indicate that the mark is provisionally refused. To conclude, the DTIC appears to be particu - larly enthusiastic about acceding to the Madrid Protocol and the ability to implement it suc - cessfully, as is evident from their recent pres - entation regarding this treaty. In reality, though, South Africa’s ability to successfully implement the Madrid Protocol is wholly dependent on the amendment of the Trade Marks Act and its regu - lations and a large-scale reform of the adminis - trative systems, processes and infrastructure at the CIPC. These amendments and reforms will only be possible with strong political commit - ment, significant infrastructural investment and buy-in from all stakeholders. Failure to make the necessary changes to South Africa’s legal and administrative systems will result in the ineffective implementation of the Madrid Protocol, thereby undermining the potential value that it ought to offer in practice. Conclusion South Africa’s legal, political and socio-econom - ic landscape presents a blend of opportunities
567 CHAMBERS.COM
Powered by FlippingBook